Episode 67: My First Chat with ChatGPT (January 23, 2029)
Teruyuki Fujita (University of Tsukuba)
I had a brief chat with ChatGPT, which quickly began to attract the world's attention at the end of last year, 2022. Today, I'd like to report on the results.
ChatGPT is an interactive language AI model developed by OpenAI, a private non-profit research institute. It is attracting attention for its advanced performance, which sets it apart from conventional interactive AI. For example, an article I saw online a few days ago, "ChatGPT Used Massively in Final Exams at Stanford University" (January 27, 2023), reported the following:
"Roughly speaking, ChatGPT has reached a level of competence that allows it to pass the final exam with a B in the MBA program at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, one of the most prestigious universities in the world."
https://www.gizmodo.jp/2023/01/chat-gpt-stanford-university.html (*in Japanese)
If you're wondering if this is true, you might want to give it a try. Below is an excerpt from a "conversation" between ChatGPT and me.
✽
*Unless otherwise noted, all conversations here are in Japanese, and the following is an English translation.
Fujita (hereafter F): What factors contributed to Japan's rapid economic growth after World
War II?
ChatGPT (C):
1. Expansion of domestic demand: Domestic consumption increased in postwar Japan, contributing to economic growth.
2. Foreign investment: Foreign companies invested in Japan, contributing to industrial expansion.
3. Labor force: A large number of highly productive workers contributed to economic growth.
4. Industrial Policy: Through its industrial policy, the government sought to expand industries such as manufacturing and mining.
5. Export Promotion: The government supported the sale of Japanese products overseas through export promotion policies.
F: Could you tell me more about "industrial policy"?
C: Industrial policy is a government policy to promote industries. In Japan,
since World War II, the following goals have been achieved through industrial
policy:
1. Reform the industrial structure: To increase efficiency and improve competitiveness.
2. Industrial expansion: Expansion of designated industries to increase domestic production, job creation, and foreign investment.
3. Technological development: We have improved the competitiveness of industry by supporting technological development.
4. Export promotion: Through export promotion policies, the government supported the sale of Japanese products overseas. Through these industrial policies, Japan's economy expanded, and economic growth was realized.
F: What specific measures were taken to "reform the industrial structure"?
C: To reform the industrial structure, the government took the following
measures:
1. Industrial restructuring: By reorganizing Japan's industrial structure, efficiency was improved.
2. Capital investment: By encouraging capital investment, the government improved industrial competitiveness.
3. Human resource development: By developing human resources, we have fostered a workforce with high labor productivity.
4. Technological development: Supporting technological development to improve industrial competitiveness.
5. Export promotion: Through export promotion policies, Japan has supported the sale of Japanese products overseas.
Through these measures, reform of the industrial structure was implemented, contributing to Japan's economic growth.
F: What specific "human resource development" policies have been
implemented?
C: The government implemented the following "human resource development"
policies:
1. Education reform: Education reform improved the quality of education and the skills of workers.
2. Engineer training: Engineering education has produced workers with high technical skills.
3. Professional development: Through professional development, the enterprise has fostered human resources with professional skills.
4. Training program: We supported the development of employees' skills through our training program.
5. Vocational skills development: We supported workers' career development through vocational skills development.
Through these measures, we were able to improve workers' skills and ensure high labor productivity.
F: Are there any unique characteristics of these "human resource development"
measures in Japan?
C: Japan's "human resource development" measures have several unique features.
1. Unified education system: Japan has a unified education system that provides education to improve workers' skills.
2. Emphasis on developing high technical skills: Japan places a high priority on improving technical skills, and therefore focuses on training engineers.
3. Emphasis on cultivating specialized craftspeople: Japan is cultivating workers with advanced technical skills by strengthening its training of specialized craftspeople.
4. System to support workers' career development: Japan is promoting a training system and a professional development system to support workers' career development.
These features of human resource development measures contribute to improving workers' skills and ensuring high labor productivity.
F: However, public adult education or lifelong learning programs in Japan
do not have a high percentage of content related to professional development.
Does this fact contradict your answer? (*I asked this question in a slightly argumentative way)
C: No, there is no contradiction. It is a fact that few formal adult education
or lifelong learning programs in Japan deal with content related to professional
development. At the same time, however, it is common for companies and
employees themselves to use training and development programs to support
employees' career development.
F: So who provides the "training and development programs" used
by "companies and employees themselves" in Japan?
C: Training and development programs in Japan are provided by companies,
labor organizations, and professional educational institutions. Many companies
offer internal training and employee training programs to help employees
advance their careers. Labor organizations and professional educational
institutions also offer training and workshops for professional development.
Although few public adult education or lifelong learning programs deal
with career development issues, it is common for employees themselves to
use training and development programs to advance their own careers.
F: Why do companies in Japan "offer internal training and employee training programs to help employees advance their careers"? Wouldn't it be more efficient to outsource training and development systems? (*I threw a curveball.)
C: In Japan, it is a company's responsibility to support the career development of its employees, and it is believed that this will lead to improved quality and competitiveness as a company. In-house training and education programs also have the advantage of allowing employees to acquire company-specific knowledge and business styles. For this reason, it is more common for training and training to be conducted within a company rather than outsourced.
F: I understand your explanation. However, sufficient internal reserves are necessary to enhance training within a company. Is it possible to continue such measures under the recent economic slowdown in Japan?
C: Even in Japan's low-growth economy, companies still place a high priority
on human resource development. They believe that by expanding in-house
training and development, they will help their employees improve their
skills and careers, thereby maintaining or enhancing their long-term competitive
advantage. It also benefits the company by increasing worker motivation,
reducing turnover, and promoting a sense of organizational unity. However,
the availability of sufficient retained earnings varies from company to
company.
F:How many languages do you comprehend? (*I abruptly changed the topic and the language to English.)
C:As an AI language model developed by OpenAI, I have been trained on a
diverse range of text data in many different languages, including English,
Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Russian, Chinese,
Japanese, Korean, and others. However, my proficiency in comprehending
and generating text in each of these languages may vary. (*He, too, responded in English, without the slightest pause.)
F:What language are you most comfortable with? (*I continued our conversation
in English.)
C:As an AI language model, I don't have personal preferences or comfort levels, but I have been primarily trained on English text data, so I am likely to have the highest proficiency in English. Nevertheless, I am designed to process and generate text in multiple languages, and I will do my best to provide accurate and helpful answers in any language that I have been trained on.
F:(*Then, I suddenly reverted to Japanese.) As training for you continues in the future and you are able to handle more information, will humans no longer need to make the effort to memorize anything?
C: No, the training and evolution of AI models will not eliminate the need
for humans to memorize things; AI models can efficiently process huge data
sets that humans cannot handle, but they cannot have a unique perspective
with human imagination, creativity, judgment, emotion, and experience.
It cannot. In addition, AI models can organize and present information,
but cannot judge the accuracy or validity of that information. Humans will
continue to play an important role because they can use their own imagination
and experience to understand and use information appropriately. (*He immediately responded in Japanese, too.)
F: You are certainly right. It was a pleasure chatting with you today. Thank
you.
C: You're welcome, it's a pleasure to meet you. If you have any questions,
please don't hesitate to ask. I look forward to seeing you soon again.
✽
What a surprise! Although it does not quite reach the level of grasping the questioner's intention and giving a sharp and focused answer, and there are noticeable overlaps and truncated responses that arise from the context of the overall conversation, I found it to be almost accurate in its response to the question posed. And there is really nothing unnatural about it as a sentence in either Japanese or English.
However, we need to be careful of the feature that opinions are presented in bullet points with natural and easy-to-understand expressions without any evidence to support the arguments. I realized that if we are exposed to easily understandable and readable expressions with a sense of security and trust that they are based on big data, we may be tempted to believe them without any hesitation.
I also felt like I could talk to ChatGPT forever, but perhaps it is the unintentionally addictive nature of the language AI model that cleverly works on people's minds to want someone to listen to them.
Even with such issues, what could only have happened in science fiction movies a short time ago is now on the verge of becoming reality.
✽
In response to this situation, some public schools in the U.S. have already banned the use of ChatGPT, and it is reported that French universities have also confirmed the banning of ChatGPT.
Meanwhile, Akil Bello, director of the New York-based National Center for Fair & Open Testing (FairTest), said, "I think the more important point to discuss is not whether to ban technology, but how to use it. Banning will never work. Educational institutions have to change. They have to embrace technology and figure out how to use it effectively for their students, the adults of the future," he points out, and I think he is right. With all the convenient tools at our fingertips, telling students not to use them rings hollow.
https://www.gizmodo.jp/2023/01/how-should-schools-relate-to-ai.html (*in Japanese)
It is no exaggeration to say that the advent of ChatGPT fundamentally challenges the conventional teaching style that emphasizes the transfer of knowledge. I can almost hear teachers saying, "We don't have time to discuss how to respond to such a demand." But the development of cutting-edge technology continues without regard to our convenience. It is just like typhoons and heavy snowfalls that come regardless of our preparedness. We have no choice but to be prepared and help our students learn how to use them.
Of course, no matter how advanced the technology of AI, including ChatGPT, becomes, our value as human beings will never be diminished. The last point ChatGPT made today is an important one (although it has been made many times before): AI models cannot have the unique perspective of human imagination, creativity, judgment, emotion, and experience. Nor can they judge the accuracy or validity of information. Humans will continue to play an important role because they can use their own imagination and experience to understand and use information appropriately.
We, as educators, are charged with the task of developing the future generations who will be able to play such a role.
(Translated and uploaded on October 7, 2024)
Back Issues
Episode 66: Challenges and Opportunities for Career Guidance towards Sustainability (January 1, 2023)
Episode 65: The First Update of a New Start (September 24, 2022)
Episode 64: What's Beyond Learning, Ver.2 (December 29, 2021)
Episode 63: We Are Supposed to Be All Different and All Wonderful, Aren't we? (October 10, 2021)
Episode 62: The Results of 2021 National Assessment of Academic Ability Urges Career
Education Practices to Exercise Ingenuity (September 5, 2021)
Episode 61: Falling or Bridging between Two Chairs: Resuming Schools after Summer
Recess and Providing Countermeasures against DOVID-19 (August 22, 2021)
Episode 60: The significance of having "the perspective on the connections to
learning across the lifespan" (July 23, 2021)
Selected Back Issues: From Episode 1 to Episode 59
Episode 56: Career Education Needed "Now" and "Here" (May 16,
2020)
Episode 33: Is Your Future "Scary" or " Exciting"? (January 27,
2018)
Episode 29: Is Career Planning Illusory Nonsense? (November 5, 2017)
Episode 22: What on Earth are the "Basic and General Competencies"? (June 17, 2017)
Episode 14: Looking Back on the Journey over 18 Years of Career Education (January
29, 2017)
The original Japanese version of Just Mumbling around Career Education series:
【号外】数学は役に立つ! Maths counts ✔(2023年1月13日)
【第66話】サステナブルなキャリア教育の実現の可能性と課題(2023年1月1日)
【第65話】今後ともどうぞよろしくお願いいたします。(2022年9月24日)
【第64話】続: 学びの先にあるもの(2021年12月29日)
【第63話】みんなちがって、みんないいのに……(2021年10月10日)
【第62話】全国学力・学習状況調査の結果公表に寄せて(2021年9月5日)
【第61話】夏季休業後の学校再開と新型コロナウイルス感染症対策(2021年8月22日)
【第60話】「生涯にわたる学習とのつながり」を見通すことの意味(2021年7月23日)
【第59話】ないないづくし(2020年8月23日+2021年6月2日)
【第58話】OECD「Learning Compass 2030」が求める力(2020年7月12日)
【第57話】続:「今、ここ」でのキャリア教育(2020年6月14日)
【第56話】「今、ここ」でのキャリア教育(2020年5月16日)
【第55話】ロールモデル(2020年4月11日)
【第54話】キャリア教育の出番です(2020年2月1日)
【第53話】係活動・当番活動(2020年1月11日)
【第52話】新学習指導要領の前文を改めて読む(2019年12月26日)
【第51話】PISA2018の結果第一報によせて(2019年12月3日)
【第50話】「キャリア・パスポート」は "お荷物"か?(2019年10月13日)
【第49話】たまには遠くを見てみよう(2019年8月13日)
【第48話】世界は動いている(2019年6月29日)
【第47話】日本版パパ・クオータ制、創設か!?(2019年5月26日)
【第46話】変わりゆく日本型雇用(2019年4月28日)
【第45話】「キャリア・パスポート」例示資料等の発出によせて(2019年4月4日)
【第44話】やっぱり英語は必要だ!(2019年3月13日)
【第43話】キャリア教育とジョン・デューイの「オキュペーション」(2019年2月9日)
【第42話】マハトマ・ガンディー生誕150周年に寄せて(2018年12月23日)
【第41話】書けない・書かないキャリア・パスポートをどうするか(2018年11月17日)
【第40話】教科を通したキャリア教育は難しい?―その3―(2018年9月24日)
【第39話】「主体的・対話的で深い学び」とキャリア教育(2018年8月12日)
【第38話】大学入学共通テストの方向性が示すもの(2018年7月8日)
【第37話】「キャリア教育の要」って、結局、何をどうするの?(2018年6月2日)
【第36話】教科を通したキャリア教育は難しい?―その2―(2018年5月6日)
【第35話】「教員が対話的に関わること」の意味(2018年4月11日)
【第34話】AI時代に求められる力(2018年3月11日)
【第33話】未来は「怖い」か「楽しみ」か(2018年1月27日)
【第32話】テレビドラマが映し出すもの(2018年1月21日)
【第31話】年の瀬の大風呂敷(2017年12月28日)
【第30話】働くって、何だろう?(2017年11月25日)
【第29話】キャリア・プランニングはナンセンス?(2017年11月5日)
【第28話】世界的に問い直される「学びの本質的な意義」(2017年10月29日)
【第27話】世界的潮流としての「教科を通したキャリア教育」の実践(2017年10月1日)
【第26話】「キャリア・パスポート」がやってくる!?(2017年9月10日)
【第25話】他山の石(?)としての1970年代のアメリカにおける実践(2017年8月27日)
【第24話】将来(おそらく)使わないものを勉強する理由 (2017年8月6日)
【第23話】「青い鳥」が住むところ (2017年7月1日)
【第22話】遅ればせながら…「基礎的・汎用的能力」って何?(2017年6月17日)
【第21話】「基礎的・汎用的能力消滅論(!?)」を検証する(2017年6月4日)
【第20話】キャリア教育の「要」としての特別活動(2017年4月23日)
【第19話】アントレプレナーシップって何だ?(2017年4月9日)
【第18話】子供たちの変容・成長をどう評価するか(2017年3月26日)
【第17話】就学前~小学校低学年の子供へのアプローチ(2017年3月11日)
【第16話】小学校・中学校の次期学習指導要領案を読む(2017年2月26日)
【第15話】小学校におけるキャリア教育の豊かな可能性(2017年2月12日)
【第14話】キャリア教育の18年の歩みを振り返る(2017年1月29日)
【第13話】今、高校3年生に伝えたいこと(2017年1月15日)
【第12話】中教審答申がキャリア教育に期待するもの(2016年12月29日)
【第11話】職場体験活動再考(2016年12月18日)
【番外編】PISA2015の結果が公表されました(2016年12月6日)
【第10話】強者の論理(2016年11月30日)
【第9話】学びの先にあるもの(2016年11月14日)
【第8話】キャリア教育と進路指導(2016年10月29日)
【第7話】五郎丸さん(2016年10月14日)
【第6話】「お花畑系キャリア教育」は言われるほど多いか?(2016年10月1日)
【第5話】金太郎飴(2016年9月18日)
【第4話】カリキュラム・マネジメントと「SMART」な目標設定 (2016年9月4日)
【第3話】キャリア教育とPDCAサイクル (2016年8月17日)
【第2話】教科を通したキャリア教育は難しい? (2016年8月2日)
【第1話】職業興味検査は使い方が肝心 (2016年7月31日)